From the monthly archives:

September 2009

Two Great Articles on Writing

by Dr Davis on September 25, 2009

A University’s Writing Practices

Instead of adopting a genre-based approach whereby disciplines are assumed to have their own specific genres which belong to them and them alone, we adopted Michael Carter’s approach of meta-genres that transcend disciplines. For example, the report of empirical research is found throughout all the social and natural sciences; in fact, two quantitative studies in two disciplines might be more similar to one another than a qualitative and quantitative study within the same discipline. However, each report of empirical research will be, in Carter’s words, “inflected” by the conventions of the particular discipline. For example, a report of a study in chemistry is more likely to have equations than a report of a study in education.

We will take these six assignment task types one by one, give examples of assignments we saw across the disciplines that seemed to fit that type, and note the specific challenges they pose for writers.

I hadn’t ever thought of them this way. It makes me want to think more.

Wiggle Room and Writing

I reflect here on four observations I have made over the past few years—first, that despite critiques of genres, realism, transparency, essentialism, and social or cultural representation recognizable forms of writing persist; second, that those recognizable forms of writing exist across several intellectual generations, including those just entering the profession; third, that while some attention tends to be paid to those forms of writing in graduate programs of study in the U.S. much of what is learned is learned informally and often only partially; and, fourth, journal editors and manuscript reviewers tend to notice the structure of those forms of writing in manuscripts submitted to a scholarly journal, identifying the presence or absence of expected elements and passing judgment on a manuscript at least in part because of the familiarity of its structure.

The whole thing is very good and well worth reading.

These are both worth reading and they are related to a publishing opportunity. The journal in which they were published is new and is having calls for papers.

{ 0 comments }

State Budget Crunch Not Really Bad Enough

by Dr Davis on September 25, 2009

dollar-sign-in-handIt’s not bad enough to take free service from retired faculty who are willing to adjunct so that classes can meet.

In February, an association of retired UNC-Chapel Hill professors sought to help ease daunting budget cuts by offering to jump back into teaching, free of charge.

The response from the university, they say, has been underwhelming.

“It was more than a gesture; it was a well-thought-out offer to the university,” said Andrew Dobelstein, a retired professor of social welfare policy and the group’s president. “I’m quite frankly surprised we haven’t gotten much response.”

There is no university mechanism for connecting retired faculty members with teaching slots or other academic roles, Strauss said, adding that those connections are best made within each department. The UNC system has no formal program concerning retired faculty members, either.

Well, if you have a 10% cut, wouldn’t you think now is the time for that?

{ 0 comments }

Ideas for WAC/WID Assignments

by Dr Davis on September 25, 2009

Tollefson of Berkeley has put together some good ideas for assignments in his “Encouraging Student Writing.”

I particularly like:

Book Review for a Professional Journal
After perusing an appropriate journal to identify the format and approach of typical book reviews, students can practice their skills in summarizing and placing material in the context of related reading and research by writing a book review for a professional audience.

and

Letter to a Public Official or Company Officer
Writing a persuasive letter, arguing for or against a particular policy, requires students to organize their case from the policymaker’s perspective, decide the best way to present supporting evidence, and anticipate and respond to counter arguments.

{ 0 comments }

Getting Involved

by Dr Davis on September 25, 2009

To what extent should an adjunct be involved in their school’s extracurricular activities?

I always want to do graduation, but I’m not voluntarily putting on a cap and gown in 112 degree heat in May and sitting outside. Ouch. Sorry. They have to pay me for that.

However, I have decided this semester that, as much as my schedule of classes on different campuses allows, I am going to be involved on campus, particularly with professional development.

So, I went to the meeting today, didn’t enjoy the mixer at the beginning (made me feel stupid, never fun), but got some good ideas.

I don’t remember how often these happen, but I am so looking forward to doing them. I like learning.

Who knows? Maybe being involved will make a difference in hiring. (I doubt it, but maybe.)

{ 0 comments }

New Anglo-Saxon Hoard Found

by Dr Davis on September 24, 2009

finds-from-the-staffordsh-004-guardianIt’s the largest hoard ever says the Guardian.

A harvest of Anglo-Saxon gold and silver so beautiful it brought tears to the eyes of one expert, has poured out of a Staffordshire field – the largest hoard of gold from the period ever found.

The weapons and helmet decorations, coins and Christian crosses amount to more than 1500 pieces, with hundreds still embedded in blocks of soil. It adds up to 5kg of gold – three times the amount found in the famous Sutton Hoo ship burial in 1939 – and 2.5kg of silver, and may be the swag from a spectacularly successful raiding party of warlike Mercians, some time around AD700.

The first scraps of gold were found in July in a farm field by Terry Herbert, an amateur metal detector who lives alone in a council flat on disability benefit, who had never before found anything more valuable than a nice rare piece of Roman horse harness. The last pieces were removed from the earth by a small army of archaeologists a fortnight ago.

This picture is from the Guardian.

Pictures on Flickr.

{ 0 comments }

Telegraphic Comments=Tweets

by Dr Davis on September 24, 2009

One of the requirements for the business writing course I am in is the creation of telegraphic comments.

Why don’t we just use the modern word? Why don’t we just say tweets?

If you can say it (with correct grammar) in 140 characters, you’ve done it.

{ 0 comments }

Tip 39: Two Birds with One Stone

by Dr Davis on September 24, 2009

2-birds-1-stone-ricko-on-flickr1Students aren’t particularly fond of the research paper, but they need to learn how to do research and report it to be successful academics. When they are being asked to do something that is “hard” for them, it can be useful to maximize the use they get out of the project.

When my students are doing the research for their long papers (on a controversial issue) I require that they find sources both for the side they agree with and against that side. I want them to understand the entire issue and not just the side that they agree with.

Then the question becomes how to have them use both sides so that they actually see the strength of the opposition’s arguments.

Possibilities:

  • Have them write the research paper from the side they disagree with first, then write the one they agree with.
  • Allow them to write the research paper they agree with, then have them compose a short refutation, as if from the opposing side, arguing against one of the points they made in their paper.
  • Have the first paper be a compare/contrast on the arguments on both sides of the topic. For example, “Global warming may or may not be caused by humans.” and then present the arguments from their research.

These multiple exercises, or even combinations thereof, allow the students to become more familiar with the arguments on both sides and encourage them to understand their side’s arguments better.

The photo is from Ricko on flickr.

{ 0 comments }

Tip 38: Explain How the Paper Fits

by Dr Davis on September 23, 2009

When asking students to write a new kind of paper, I try to give them a visual metaphor that lets them see what place this paper would hold.

pot_hole-river-carToday I went with a pothole in the road metaphor for the “gap in the literature.” I used that, further, to explain that someone who has seen the huge pothole in the road might create a literature review in order to point out the pothole to others and, to some extent, to lay the sand base to begin to fill the pothole in.

I also explained that while it would be totally cool if some of them were able to write that kind of a literature review, I did not actually expect it of them. What they should do, I told them, was to write a literature review to describe the road. They’re new; they don’t know where they are going. Their lit review should tell me what road they are on.

They laughed. But I hope it got through to them.

I also explained it another way. I told them if there were almost no papers on their topic, even with good search terms, then it was possible that they were at the top of a mountain where the snow is melting and starting to form a stream. It’s very cold and lonely up there, but they can hop right over that stream no problem.

If, on the other hand, there are thousands of papers on their topics, even after narrowing, they’re now trying to walk across the Mississippi in full flood. I asked them what would happen. They said they would drown. Exactly! So the lit review for them is supposed to make a little dam that slows part of the water down enough for them to be able to join the conversation.

I don’t know if those metaphors helped or not, but it was an interesting day.

The background of the class:
I am teaching a writing in the disciplines course with sophomore students who have not done any work in their fields. The course is supposed to both introduce them to their fields, in which I am not an expert, and introduce them to the writing of their fields, in which I am an expert.

The picture is from Mopo.ca..

{ 0 comments }

Humanities: Medieval

by Dr Davis on September 23, 2009

Modern Medieval gives out one of his lectures for an intro humanities class.

{ 0 comments }

Choices

by Dr Davis on September 23, 2009

I’m going to PCA/ACA SwTx in February.
In March I plan on going to CCTE. Also in March CEA is in Texas. Seems like I ought to go to that.
PCA is in April.
Kalamazoo is in May.

So, here’s the problem. PCA allows rolling applications. If they don’t take one, in two weeks I can have a response on the next one. Etc.

CEA is a one shot deal. I won’t hear from them until after PCA is closed.

I don’t really want to go to four conferences during the spring semester, especially as I am starting a part-time job with a new college.

PCA is enjoyable, a national conference, and I have lots to write on multiple topics there.

CEA is a national conference, in my state, and there are two or three CFPs I could do.

I guess…. I should apply to CEA and take my chances. If they accept my work, I’ll go there. If they don’t, I’ll only go to two conferences in the spring.

That doesn’t seem like very many though.

And I have four this semester. But two are not during class times.

All four of the spring (5 if I include K-zoo) are during class times. Hmm.

{ 0 comments }