From the category archives:

Writing in the Disciplines

Poster Presentations

by Dr Davis on June 10, 2010

I was looking at other websites for poster presentations. I found some good ones.

Design of Scientific Posters
This one has some good samples.

Poster Presentations
This website has lots of links for readings and instructions.
The most interesting thing, though, is that it also has links to sample poster sessions online. I think it would be interesting, when teaching poster design, to have the students go to these and create critiques.

Advice on Designing Scientific Posters
He has a good introduction, with good visuals, to what it means to be presenting a poster presentation.

{ 0 comments }

What is technical communication?

by Dr Davis on June 7, 2010

Someone asked me if, as a rhetoric person, I could do technical communication. I said of course. I think the person didn’t understand what technical communication means.

Five characteristics distinguish technical communication from the more traditional composition courses in college curricula. Technical communication
is situation oriented and often directed to very specific audiences
has a strong visual component
has ties to other fields, including psychology and computer science

says Rebecca Kelly

I think that the first two points are true of business writing in general. However the last three are what make technical communication unique.

“Visual rhetoric” is becoming a hot topic in conferences so it may be that the visual component is not as unique to tech comm as I perceive it to be.

But this definition is a starting place for a conversation.

{ 0 comments }

Multimedia Writing and Technical Communication

by Dr Davis on June 4, 2010

Arizona State University has a list of individual journals that publish in the area of multimedia writing and technical communication.

Examples:

Computers and Composition
Articles devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research.

Ethics and Information Technology
Articles on the social and ethical dimensions of emerging information technology.

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Latest communication practices, problems and trends in both business and academic settings

Journal of Computer Mediated Communication
The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC) is a web-based, peer-reviewed scholarly journal. Its focus is social science research on computer-mediated communication via the Internet, the World Wide Web, and wireless technologies.

{ 0 comments }

Blogs for Health Science Readings

by Dr Davis on June 1, 2010

hs-surgery-drawingI teach a freshman composition course for health science professionals (i.e. majors).

Weird Nursing Tales is an interesting read.

I already use A Day in the Life of an Ambulance Driver.

And RN Central has a list “Life in the ER: 50 Best Blogs.” I guess I’ll be looking through some of those.

{ 0 comments }

Reading in the Social Sciences

by Dr Davis on May 5, 2010

If you are reading in the social sciences, there is a funny PhD Comic for you.

Sentences
phd050310s

{ 0 comments }

Research Confidential?

by Dr Davis on March 24, 2010

I was at Web Use the other day and saw a book that might be interesting to own and read:

This collection of essays aims to fill a notable gap in the existing literature on research methods in the social sciences. While the methods literature is extensive, rarely do authors discuss the practical issues and challenges they routinely confront in the course of their research projects. As a result, editor Eszter Hargittai argues, each new cohort is forced to reinvent the wheel, making mistakes that previous generations have already confronted and resolved. Research Confidential seeks to address this failing by supplying new researchers with the kind of detailed practical information that can make or break a given project. Written in an informal, accessible, and engaging manner by a group of prominent young scholars, many of whom are involved in groundbreaking research in online contexts, this collection promises to be a valuable tool for graduate students and educators across the social sciences.

Research Confidential: Solutions to Problems Most Social Scientists Pretend They Never Have

{ 0 comments }

Oral Presentation Grading

by Dr Davis on January 4, 2010

I had oral reports in class this semester. I graded them hard. Most people made As anyway, because they did exactly what I wanted. Four people earned Ds and one earned an F. (This of the people who did the reports, 46 out of 50.)

I was very hard on the grades. If you went over a full minute, you lost a letter grade. If your poster wasn’t legible from six feet away, you lost a letter grade. If you did not introduce your topic, you lost a letter grade.

One student went from a C- to a D+ (though we don’t use +/-) and really wanted to know why he didn’t make a C. The main reason was his work was late. However, he would have made a C if I had not graded so hard on the oral presentation because he did good work.

So I am rethinking my grading, again. I don’t think I will change the rubric for this semester. He is the only person whose grade would change because of it and I don’t want to encourage grade grubbing. I think if he had asked, rather than complained, I might have been willing to do it, though. And that bothers me.

So I need to be more forethoughtful about the presentation grades.

MsMicrobe, on a Chronicle forumgave these as her criteria:

1. Main topic controversy identified
2. Adequate background
3. Organization of talk is clear to audience
4. Data presented to support ideas
5. Conclusion clear.
6. Appropriate scientific language used
7. Effectively uses visual aids
8. Effective delivery
9. Answers questions
10. On time. (with reasonable limits above and below the target time)

All of the students are expected to ask questions. I will call on someone to ask a question if none arise.

I break speaking down into confident body language and confident voice usage. I have each student fill out a feedback sheet for the speaker. They have to tell the speaker the best thing they did with body language (posture, eye contact, etc.) and what one thing they should focus on improving. They also have to praise the best thing the speaker did with their voice (speed, volume, inflection) and indicate what one area the speaker should work to improve.

I do NOT want to have to look at 50×50 feedback sheets, but I like the idea of doing it.

I am going to think about this long and hard this semester.

Fun idea
Oh, this is a good idea. And it might be fun.

Give a “bad” presentation illustrating some common problems, and let the class critique you.

from Systeme D at the same forum.

{ 2 comments }

Health Sciences Changes

by Dr Davis on November 6, 2009

This Chronicle article is of interest to me.

Learning Goes Under a New Microscope
Health-sciences major at U. of Minn. tests models for teaching and tenure

I want to know what they find.

{ 0 comments }

SCMLA– Technical Writing

by Dr Davis on November 4, 2009

I took notes at this session and transferred them onto my blog. So I guess that means it is retroactively live blogged.

Steve Marsden
teaches Am Lit and late 19th C lit
Stephen F. Austin University

topic:
Using Student Examples in Technical Writing

Students are stirred by contradictory impulses
They want to create a perfect product for the class.

Examples can be well-written concretized advice.
Used badly -> simply “copy monkeys” without understanding audience and language needs

Questions about Examples
Why do students want examples?
How do they pick the examples they use?
How do they use them?
How do they misuse the examples?
What can be done to minimize misuse?

Students don’t know register, style, or format.
Students perceive the example as vital.

Students get a sense of expectations through the examples.

The students need to be able to extract the important from the example so that they will be able to apply this skill in their work.

Give LOTS of examples.
Give one with detailed analysis.
Use a LOT of examples.

The vast majority of students gravitate toward the models of students, so student examples.

Why?
-prefer student models to set expectations and quality goals

They will rise to the student model they are given; therefore, no matter how difficult and well done, this is the example the students will follow.

Told the students to do something– worked for one semester on a technical manual.

Students now see the great student models and do better work.

The students will look at the best-designed OR the prettiest example and will take all the elements, even if the writing is bad.

Students prefer examples that resemble their topics.
Students prefer that the examples are given out in handouts.
or
Students prefer examples that are given online as files.
In other words, they want something they can keep in their hot little hands, not just something you show them and take away.

According to their own reporting, how students used the examples:

  • 44 of 51 read the examples for organizational and structure
  • 38 of 51 read for language, working, and tone
  • 17 of 51 read for heading titles
  • 15 of 51 read for font, spacing, and format
  • 12 of 51 read for chart and graph usage
  • 21 of 51 used the entire document as a template for their paper

Problems with how they used the examples:

  • 7 of 51 copied too much
  • 4 of 51 copied what didn’t apply
  • 7 of 51 used the bad example, unaware or not remembering that they were negative examples
  • 9 of 51 chose the student example over the prompt or the grading rubric, if there was a conflict

Too often they used the example as boilerplate text.

Maybe put a monster tag on the bad examples, labeling them as such.
I like the idea of actually putting a monster on there. It applies the literature they may (or may not) have read to the technical writing. I just kind of like a monster as a monster tag. Would have to make sure the students understood that Frankenstein’s monster was a bad idea.

How do you prevent misuse of examples?

  • multiple models, with an acceptable range of topics
  • never give out a bad example which is not labeled BAD
  • distribute examples as scanned PDFs, then they can’t just cut and paste the template
  • add examples during:
    • gathering
    • evaluating
    • adapting process
    • and ethics discussion

    Laura Osborne

    adjunct at Stephen F. Austin State University
    primarily teaching online

    topic: “The Importance of Building Student Interaction in Online Technical Writing Classes”

    Laura Osborne joined the English faculty at SFA in Fall 2006, after a successful seven year career in the Texas A&M University Libraries where she worked as a technical writer and computer software trainer. Prior to that, she earned her Master’s degree in English at Texas A&M University, during which time she served as a writing center consultant as well as an instructor of Freshman-level composition and Sophmore-level technical writing. She was born and raised in Northwest Louisiana (near Shreveport) and earned her B.A. in English from Louisiana State University in Shreveport. In addition to her academic credentials, she is also a Certified Training Professional and a Certified Online Instructor.

    importance of building student interaction with:
    materials
    classmates
    instructor

    Need instructor leadership for student interaction.
    How we use the tools is especially important.
    Just setting up a discussion won’t work.

    The typical get-to-know scenario doesn’t work.

    students don’t realize the online class is NOT self-paced

    Two methods to build community:

    1. face to face introduction meeting for an on-campus orientation and an on-line chat orientation
    tell number of students enrolled
    tell majors of students
    give identifying information so that students can feel part of the group

    2. post introductions to people the first week
    have a photo
    put the teacher/instructor introduction up first
    require a photo for student introduction (even if they use an icon)
    folks need to be able to see something to identify the post’s author

    Posting strategies:
    Hallway (just for students to discuss among themselves) was not used.
    I told them I would not be there and it would not be graded, so they didn’t go there. They did not have a reason to discuss outside of interaction required. Could you suggest Hallway as a place to get help where teacher won’t look? Is this a place for the faux-student strategy talked about elsewhere?

    An empty discussion board is scary.
    Posting first is taking a big risk.

    The instructor can post first to model what expectations are, as long as the instructor post is a model/example.

    For in-group assignments teacher should also post first.
    An empty small group board is also scary.

    Teacher responsibility:
    Personal availability is important.
    Write the lecture materials.
    That is not, however, where your responsibility ends. That alone isn’t going far enough.

    Chats:
    Schedule and REQUIRE chats.
    I did not do this. I should have done this. When I teach online again, I will do this.
    Give point value to the chats.
    Grade them: for participation, # of responses, depth of responses.
    (Depth of responses better grade, but number of responses is easier to grade.)

    Schedule enough, but not too many, chats.
    You need 15 to 20 students attending each chat.

    Online chat does not replace a lecture.

    Rules for chats:

    1. Give the topic ahead of time, including dealing with any reading required.
    2. Instructor should ask leading questions. (I think she means questions that come first, will draw people out. Not the legal use of this term.)
    3. Make sure you write, “Good question” or “Thanks for answering” at the very least.

    Vital:
    Availability– through online office hours, chats, IMing
    Active leadership–jump in and post first EVERY time
    Encouragement–Be generous with your positive feedback.
    Clear–Assign concrete point grades to each part of the course, including posts, discussions, and chats.

    Chats are the number one thing listed as positive in my evaluations.

    She holds an on-campus orientation. Only half the class is local.
    What does she do with the part of class that is not local?

    { 0 comments }

    Stockholm Syndrome in Academics

    by Dr Davis on October 18, 2009

    Gordon, A. (2005) Terrorism as an academic subject after 9/11: Searching the internet reveals a Stockholm Syndrome trend. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28(1), 45-59. Retrieved October 3, 2009, from the PsycINFO database.

    One of my students reported on this article for her annotation. From her annotation, “The general view of the context of this reaction creates the impression that the terrorists succeeded in creating the kind of behavior characterized as the Stockholm Syndrome.”

    I haven’t read the study yet, but I find it fascinating.

    What does it have to do with teaching English? I guess it is something interesting learned during WAC/WID classes.

    { 0 comments }